Were born in our family in 2006. They were all together for the first time last June. We all worked hard to make a cute little photo shoot. Andi made personalized onesies and tutus. Julianna made bracelets and I made the little flowers for their hair. All of our visions of a picture-perfect picture were shattered with tears for different reasons from most of them. Here is the best we got (and it is photoshopped!).
At the time it was a little frustrating, but a year later it is a keepsake. This year we didn't go to so much work for photo shoot. In fact, we just plopped them on the couch the last day at the cabin for an unplanned picture. Looks like we coordinated a pink-brown-green color combo, but no. If we thought last year's was hard, this one was worse because they could move!! Here are a few:
The best one in this group is also photoshopped. So the debate: Cache argues that photoshopping isn't 'legal' for family history because it didn't really happen. I agree. But for a framed photo, I want one where everyone looks their best. What's your call?
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
5 Baby Girls. . . .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I don't know which is better. Love Tessa's spread eagle!!! That is too funny! I didn't get a copy of last year's photo. Could I get one of each year from you?
I have the same request as Katie!
I feel I really missed out--how much fun it must have been to see these babies all grown up! Too bad you all didn't want to join me in having another in 2008!
Adorable pictures. I would love to know which one belongs to whom.
Aunt Nancy
In the tutu picture from left to right is Tessa-mine; Hope-Danna's; Mary-Katie's; Liberty-Dave's; Joslyn-Andi's
In the couch picture it is Hope, Tess, Liberty, Mary and Joslyn.
I like the cropped picture, and to Cache - of course it happened. Things were changing so fast on that couch that not only did this picture happened, so did a thousand others, it is just that the cameras were not fast enough to get a fraction of them. Grumpa
Post a Comment